Four and still flawed? Reflections on GDPR
Earlier this month, the UK Government announced a new Data Reform Bill in the Queen’s speech. Whilst there are currently no certainties around what the bill will ultimately contain, many predict it will deviate significantly from the current legislation – based largely on the European Union’s GDPR.
GDPR, one of the strictest data privacy regulations in the world, was passed by the EU four years ago today to ensure the data protection of residents. With the legislation still leaving its mark, and change on the horizon, we spoke to eight business leaders to discover their reflections on the regulations, their tips for staying compliant, and what future regulations might mean for UK businesses.
Andy Swift, Technical Director of Offensive Security at , casts his mind back to when the legislation was first introduced and the reactions it generated. “Back in 2018 GDPR prompted significant discussion and self-reflection among organisations, but it’s fair to say its impact waned as the expected torrent of fines and penalties never really arrived. Like all data enforcement regulations, resourcing and governance for GDPR have been challenging – which has led to some complacency creeping in”.
He rationalises that “ultimately, GDPR is still very young. It has provided important awareness and structural guidance throughout its four years of existence, and I anticipate that its presence and impact will grow as non-compliance fines become more prevalent”.
Aims and achievements of the legislation
Jakub Lewandowski, Legal Director and Global Data Governance Officer at , breaks down the legislation and explains exactly what it changed. “GDPR and UK GDPR respectively introduced a lot of extremely useful concepts and mechanisms, most importantly they helped develop a common language to discuss privacy and data protection issues. As with any legislation with multiple stakeholders involved and affected, certain choices and priorities had to be made”.
The enforcement for full legislation was met with mixed reactions. However, Kevin Kelly, Vice President & General Manager, Global Compliance Solutions at , highlights the successes. He argues that it “has prompted significant improvements in the governance, monitoring, awareness, and strategic decision-making regarding the use of consumer data”.
He furthers: “one of the ideas behind GDPR was to assure consumers that their data will not fall into the wrong hands. For the most part, consumer data and privacy is now considered a top priority by leading companies”.
Ensuring full compliance
Regardless of any upcoming changes, businesses need to ensure they are GDPR compliant, which means they must follow the current data protection regulations. Kris Lahiri, Co-Founder and Chief Security Officer at , expands on how to do this, “as data privacy requirements continue to increase across the world, it’s imperative that organisations have total visibility into their regulated and sensitive data. By establishing effective data governance programs that can evolve with rapidly-changing requirements – in addition to ongoing cybersecurity awareness training – businesses can stay on top of regulations, as well as potential threats like ransomware”.
Phil Dunlop, VP EMEA at , also gives his tips: “centralised, tamper-evident audit logging ensures data can be trusted for accuracy. Securing personal data against internal and external threats, loss or damage is also critical, therefore automatic file integrity checking can validate that a file has not been altered. Having a robust GDPR-compliant framework in place will extend your cyber security practices, boosting customer trust and loyalty. By using customer information effectively, an organisation can make better business decisions and ensure a better return on tech investments”.
Learning from the past as we look to the future
Despite the achievements of the bill, the fact remains that many people feel it left much to be desired.
Michael Queenan, CEO and Co-Founder at , states that even now “our personal data is anything but personal. Currently, the large corporations and government institutions that collect our personal data are responsible for using and selling it. Although GDPR introduced rules on how such organisations should handle and protect this data, it arguably did not go far enough as it does not specify exactly what businesses can and cannot do with their customers’ personal information. For individuals, therefore, there is a huge loss of control over their data”.
Looking to the future, Donnie MacColl, Director of EMEA Technical Services at , believes that the new legislation planned by the government “is more of a statement of intent rather than policies that are set in stone. It remains to be seen how the government will move forward as further detail emerges”.
He continues: “concerns have been raised that organisations won’t be able to use personal data to optimise the sales process. While this is likely to become more challenging, there is a strong argument to say that, like GDPR, the emphasis must remain on keeping personal data more secure. The Bill seeks to strike a balance between data protection and the ease of doing business and that is to be welcomed”.
Richard Orange, Vice President EMEA at , agrees that the direction of the new Data Reform Bill isn’t as clear as it will need to be, as he concludes: “At the moment we are in the very early stages of this process and there is a lot of speculation over what the logistics of what the next few months may look like. However, we do know that it will be important to be able to regulate data sovereignty from country to country, as this may become a challenge. Regions across the UK will need to find commonality and work cohesively for any reforms to be effective”.